<style>
  
#bubble {
top:40px;
right:0;
position:absolute;
display:block;
height:28px;
background:url(images/bubble_right.gif) no-repeat right;
}

#bubble p {
display:block;
font-size:11px;
color:#fff;
height:28px;
padding:4px 12px 0 10px;
background:url(images/bubble_left.gif) no-repeat top left;
}

#content {
margin-top: 20px;
background: #fff!important;
float:left;
/*width:578px;*/
width:71%;
}

#content h2 {
	color: #000;
	font-size: 18px;
	font-weight: 700;
}

#content h2 a {
text-decoration:none;
}

#content h2 a:hover {
text-decoration:underline;
}

#content h2.archive {
font-weight:normal;
font-size:22px;
color:#1c1c1c;
padding:0;
margin:5px 0 20px 0;
border:none;
text-align:left;
}

.comments {
color:#333;
margin:0 0 15px 0;
border-bottom:#bbb 1px solid;
}

.comments a {
background:#fff;
padding:0 7px 5px 0;
color:#333;
text-decoration:none;
}

.comments a:hover {
color:#c00;
}

.navigation {
background:#f9f9f9;
font-size:11px;
padding:5px 10px;
margin:0 0 20px 0;
border-top:#bbb 1px solid;
}

.navigation a {
color:#555;
font-weight:bold;
text-decoration:none;
}

.navigation a:hover {
color:#333;
text-decoration:none;
}

.main h3 {
font-size:16px;
font-weight:normal;
margin:0 0 15px 0;
}

.main img {
padding:2px;
border:#ddd 2px solid;
}

.main a img {
padding:2px;
border:#0085b5 2px solid;
}

.main a:hover img {
padding:2px;
border:#ca0002 2px solid;
}

.main p {
line-height:18px;
margin:0 0 15px 0;
}

.main ol {
line-height:18px;
margin:0 0 15px 30px;
}

.main ul {
line-height:18px;
margin:0 0 15px 30px;
}

.main li {
margin:0 0 5px 0;
}

.meta {
background:#f3f3f3;
font-size:11px;
line-height:15px;
color:#333;
padding:5px 10px;
margin:0 0 30px 0;
border-top:#bbb 1px solid;
}

.signature {
float:left;
padding:0 15px 0 0;
border-right:#bbb 1px solid;
width:200px;
}

.tags {
float:left;
padding:0 0 0 15px;
width:440px;
}

#sidebar {
background: #323232;
border-bottom-right-radius: 30px;
margin-top: 20px;
font-size:12px;
float:right;
width:284px;
padding: 15px;
color: white;
}

#sidebar a {
	color: #DBA922;
}

#sidebar h3 {
display: block;
color: white;
font-size:14px;
margin:20px 0 10px 0;
}

#sidebar ul {
list-style:none;
padding: 0 0 0 20px;
margin: 0;
}

#sidebar ul ul {
margin:5px 0 0 10px;
}

#sidebar ul ul ul {
margin:5px 0 0 10px;
}

#sidebar ul li {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}

#author h3 {
margin:5px 0 5px 0;
}

#searchform {
margin:15px 0 0 0;
}

#searchform input {
background:#222;
font-size:11px;
margin:2px 0;
padding:1px 4px 2px 4px;
border:#888 1px solid;
color:#eee;
}

#searchform input:hover {
background:#333;
border:#999 1px solid;
color:#fff;
cursor:pointer;
}

#searchform #s {
background:#f6f6f6;
font-size:11px;
margin:2px 0;
padding:2px 4px;
border:#aaa 1px solid;
color:#222;
}

#searchform #s:hover {
border:#c00 1px solid;
cursor:text;
}

input.searchfield {
background:#f6f6f6;
font-size:11px;
display:block;
margin:5px 0 8px 0;
padding:2px 4px;
border:#aaa 1px solid;
color:#222;
}

input.searchfield:hover {
background:#eee;
color:#222;
}

input.submit {
background:#222;
font-size:11px;
display:block;
margin:0 0 10px 0;
padding:1px 4px 2px 4px;
border:#888 1px solid;
color:#eee;
}

input.submit:hover {
background:#333;
cursor:pointer;
border:#999 1px solid;
color:#fff;
}

input.subcom {
background:#eee;
font-size:11px;
margin:0 0 10px 0;
padding:1px 4px 2px 4px;
border:#888 1px solid;
color:#222;
}

input.subcom:hover {
background:#222;
cursor:pointer;
border:#888 1px solid;
color:#eee;
}

input.comment {
background:#f6f6f6;
font-size:11px;
padding:2px 4px;
border:#aaa 1px solid;
color:#222;
}

input.comment:hover {
border:#c00 1px solid;
}

textarea {
background:#f6f6f6;
font-size:12px;
width:400px;
padding:2px 4px;
border:#aaa 1px solid;
color:#222;
}

textarea:hover {
border:#c00 1px solid;
}

.postinput small {
font-size:11px;
margin:0 0 0 5px;
}

p.logged {
font-size:12px;
}

h3.reply {
font-size:15px;
margin:0 0 10px 0;
}

.nocomments {
margin:0 0 30px 0;
}

ol.commentlist {
font-size:12px;
list-style:none;
margin:10px 0 30px 0;
border-bottom:#bbb 1px solid;
}

.commentlist li {
border-top:#bbb 1px solid;
padding:0 0 10px 0;
}

.commentlist li.bypostauthor {
border-top:#bbb 5px solid;
background-color:#f3f3f3;
}

.comment_mod {
margin:10px 0 0 10px;
}

.comment_mod em {
background-color:#fff897;
padding:1px 3px;
}

.comment_author {
margin:10px 0;
float:right;
width:190px;
}

.comment_author img {
float:left;
margin:5px 12px 0 0;
}

.comment_author p {
line-height:20px;
}

.comment_author small {
font-size:11px;
}

.comment_text {
float:left;
width:470px;
margin:0 0 0 10px;
}

.comment_text p {
line-height:18px;
margin:7px 0;
}

.comment_meta {
font-size:12px;
}

#commentform p {
line-height:18px;
margin:0 0 15px 0;
}

blockquote {
background:url(images/quote.gif) no-repeat top left;
padding:0 0 0 60px;
min-height:50px;
}

.clear {
clear:both;
}

.warning p {
background:url(images/warning.gif) no-repeat left;
height:160px;
padding:20px 0 0 90px;
font-size:20px;
margin:0 0 0 10px;
}

#wp-calendar {
padding:10px 0 0 0;
font-size:12px;
}

#wp-calendar caption {
text-align:left;
padding:0 0 5px 0;
}

#wp-calendar tr th,
#wp-calendar tr td {
padding:0 6px 0 0 ;
text-align:right;
}

#wp-calendar td a {
font-weight:bold;
}

#wp-calendar td a:hover {
font-weight:bold;
}

img.wp-smiley {
padding:0;
border:none;
}

input:focus, textarea:focus{
background-color:#ffc;
}

abbr {
border:none;
}

.aligncenter {
display: block;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}

.alignleft {
float:left;
}

.alignright {
float:right;
}

.wp-caption {
border:1px solid #ddd;
text-align:center;
background-color:#f3f3f3;
padding-top:4px;
margin:10px;
-moz-border-radius:3px;
-khtml-border-radius:3px;
-webkit-border-radius:3px;
border-radius:3px;
}

.wp-caption img {
margin:0;
padding:0;
border:0 none;
}

.wp-caption-dd {
font-size:11px;
line-height:17px;
padding:0 4px 5px;
margin:0;
}

/* self-clear floats */

.group:after {
content: "."; 
display: block; 
height: 0; 
clear: both; 
visibility: hidden;
}
#content.group .main img{display:none!important;}
#cas_menu{display:none!important;}
#cas_menu ul li a{height:auto!important;}

  </style>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Westport CT Medical Malpractice Lawyer &#124; Rich Raphael Attorney Blog &#187; FDA</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/category/fda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:46:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>FDA to Investigate Safety of Essure Birth Control</title>
		<link>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2015/08/06/safety-of-essure-birth-control/</link>
		<comments>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2015/08/06/safety-of-essure-birth-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 16:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Writer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control side effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essure device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety of essure birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westport personal injury attorney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/?p=904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Reports of serious concerns over a popular contraceptive, used by countless women, is coming under federal review due to multiple reports of dangerous medical complications suffered by women who have used the device. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced that they are reviewing the safety of the implant Essure. The contraceptive device is manufactured by Bayer [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2015/08/06/safety-of-essure-birth-control/">FDA to Investigate Safety of Essure Birth Control</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog">Westport CT Medical Malpractice Lawyer | Rich Raphael Attorney Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright wp-image-926 size-medium" style="margin: 5px;" src="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/birth-control-safety-Connecticut-300x200.jpg" alt="birth control safety, safety of essure birth control, Westport Personal Injury Lawyer" width="300" height="200" />Reports of serious concerns over a popular contraceptive, used by countless women, is coming under federal review due to multiple reports of <a href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/medical-malpractice">dangerous medical complications</a> suffered by women who have used the device.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Essure-FDA-New-Public-Review-Complaints-Complications-Birth-Control-Device-310161461.html" target="_blank">Food and Drug Administration (FDA)</a> has announced that they are reviewing the safety of the implant Essure. The contraceptive device is manufactured by Bayer and has been on the market since 2002. The device is made of two metal coils which are inserted into the fallopian tubes as a way to block contraception.</p>
<p>However, the FDA says that they have received more than 5,000 complaints of medical issues, including abdominal pain, fatigue, headaches, and weight fluctuations, by female patients prescribed Essure since its approval. More than 400 women and/or their doctors have reported the coils moving away from the fallopian tubes and into other parts of the patient’s reproductive system.</p>
<p>There have also been reports of five fetal deaths, which occurred when the Essure device failed to prevent pregnancy.</p>
<p>Since its approval, the Essure device has been implanted into approximately 750,000 women. Based on the number of complaints the FDA has received, this means approximated one in every 150 women has had a problem with the device.</p>
<p>The FDA has scheduled a public hearing to be held on September 24, 2015 to review the safety of the product. The hearing will include the agency’s Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel. This hearing is being scheduled due in part to a <a href="http://www.nbcnewyork.com/investigations/Essure-Birth-Control-FDA-Pain-Studies-I-Team.html" target="_blank">New York television news channel’s investigation</a> regarding the inconsistencies which took place during the clinical trials of Essure. These trials, which failed to disclose complaints by trial patients, were presented to the FDA in order to get the agency’s approval for the device.</p>
<p>If you have experienced medical complications or other issues from having the Essure device implanted, or any other medical device issues, contact an experienced <a href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/contact">Westport personal injury attorney</a> to find out what legal recourse you may have for your pain and loss. For a free initial consultation about your case, call Attorney Richard H. Raphael at 203-226-6168 today.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2015/08/06/safety-of-essure-birth-control/">FDA to Investigate Safety of Essure Birth Control</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog">Westport CT Medical Malpractice Lawyer | Rich Raphael Attorney Blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2015/08/06/safety-of-essure-birth-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Top Hospitals Ban the Use of Morcellators for Hysterectomies</title>
		<link>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/05/12/ban-use-morcellators-hysterectomies/</link>
		<comments>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/05/12/ban-use-morcellators-hysterectomies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 11:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Writer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Medical Malpractice Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banned surgical devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut medical malpractice attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[have a hysterectomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hysterectomies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morcellators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[painful fibroid tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-operative testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remove fibroid tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spread of cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgical device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uterine cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Brigham and Women&#8217;s Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, the Cleveland Clinic, and the University of Pennsylvania Health System have been added to the growing list of prominent hospitals who have suspended the use of a surgical device used in hysterectomies because it can cause the spread of cancer. Forty percent of hysterectomies are done because of the presence of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/05/12/ban-use-morcellators-hysterectomies/">More Top Hospitals Ban the Use of Morcellators for Hysterectomies</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog">Westport CT Medical Malpractice Lawyer | Rich Raphael Attorney Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright wp-image-104 size-full" style="margin: 5px;" src="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Hysterectomies-Connecticut-Medical-Malpractice-Attorney.jpg" alt="banned surgical devices, Connecticut medical malpractice attorney, have a hysterectomy, hysterectomies, morcellators, painful fibroid tumors, pre-operative testing, remove fibroid tumors, spread of cancer, surgical device, uterine cancer" width="300" height="200" /></p>
<p>Brigham and Women&#8217;s Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, the Cleveland Clinic, and the University of Pennsylvania Health System have been added to the <a title="The Wall Street Journal" href="http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304788404579519932650030694?mg=reno64-wsj&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304788404579519932650030694.html" target="_blank">growing list of prominent hospitals</a> who have suspended the use of a surgical device used in hysterectomies because it can cause the spread of cancer.</p>
<p>Forty percent of <a title="Connecticut Medical Malpractice Attorney" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/medical-malpractice" target="_blank">hysterectomies</a> are done because of the presence of painful fibroid tumors. The device that these hospitals have banned is a power morcellator, which is used to help remove fibroid tumors during hysterectomies.</p>
<p>The use of a morcellator involves making a small incision near the belly button to remove the uterus. Recovery time is three to five days, compared to four to six weeks when the uterus is removed via conventional surgery.</p>
<p>Surgeons use the morcellator to slice up the fibroids or the entire uterus, thus allowing the tissue to be removed through the tiny incision that was made.</p>
<p>But the <a href="https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-safety/safety-communications">Food and Drug Administration (FDA)</a> recently announced the dangers associated with morcellation because the procedure can spread any cancer cells that may be present in the fibroids or the uterus, leaving them behind in the abdomen and pelvic area.</p>
<p>According to the FDA, one in every 350 women who undergo the procedure has uterine cancer which goes undetectable in any pre-operative testing. The spreading of these cancer cells by this procedure significantly decreases rates of long-term survival.</p>
<p>A solution to the issue is to put a bag around the device while the procedure is being performed in order to catch any of that tissue. However, adding the bag would require additional training for surgeons and this could drive up the cost of the procedure.</p>
<p>Studies revealing the dangers of the procedure spreading cancer cells have been around for several years. In 2011, researchers from South Korea presented at a medical conference in Florida their findings of a study they did comparing morcellating tumors or removing them whole. In the group of patients whose tumors were removed whole, 19 percent died within five years. In the group of patients whose tumors were morcellated, 44 percent died within three years. There have been similar results in studies done by studies done in Boston and in Germany.</p>
<p>If you have been left struggling with serious health problems after having a hysterectomy done, contact an experienced <a title="Connecticut medical malpractice attorney" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/contact" target="_blank">Connecticut medical malpractice attorney</a> to find out what compensation you may be entitled to for pain and loss.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/05/12/ban-use-morcellators-hysterectomies/">More Top Hospitals Ban the Use of Morcellators for Hysterectomies</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog">Westport CT Medical Malpractice Lawyer | Rich Raphael Attorney Blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/05/12/ban-use-morcellators-hysterectomies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unsterile Medications Recalled</title>
		<link>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/02/21/unsterile-medications-recalled/</link>
		<comments>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/02/21/unsterile-medications-recalled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Writer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Medical Malpractice Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA Recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut medical malpractice lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsterile medication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In late December, Abrams Royal, a compounding pharmacy based in Texas, voluntarily recalled all products produced at its Dallas plant meant for sterile use, according to a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) press release. “Recalled products include injectable medications, intravenous (IV) injections, eye drops, pellet implants, nasal sprays, inhalation solutions, and eye ointments that were [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/02/21/unsterile-medications-recalled/">Unsterile Medications Recalled</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog">Westport CT Medical Malpractice Lawyer | Rich Raphael Attorney Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-34" style="margin: 5px;" src="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/pills-medication-186137932-300x300.jpg" alt="medication recall IMAGE" width="300" height="300" />In late December, Abrams Royal, a compounding pharmacy based in Texas, voluntarily recalled all products produced at its Dallas plant meant for sterile use, according to a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) press release. “Recalled products include injectable medications, intravenous (IV) injections, eye drops, pellet implants, nasal sprays, inhalation solutions, and eye ointments that were distributed between June 17, 2013 and December 17, 2013,” the FDA reports. Because these products are meant for sterile use, patients who come into contact with them face serious risk of infection or injury.</p>
<p>Abrams was made aware of the situation after just one adverse event. A patient in California who received a mineral IV injection “had blood cultures that tested positive for <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i>, a gram-negative bacterium that can cause many types of infection,” according to the FDA. Such <a href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/Medical-Malpractice/" target="_blank">infections</a> range from pneumonia to meningitis.</p>
<p>Howard Skalmberg, director of the Office of Compliance at the FDA said in the statement that patient safety is the agency’s top priority. “Using these products puts patients at an unacceptable risk,” Skalmberg said, “and we urge health care professionals to follow recall instructions issued by the firm.”</p>
<p>It’s not just unsterile medications, such as those recalled by Abrams, which cause infections in the hospital, however. Dr. Peter Pronovost, director of the Quality and Safety Research Group at Johns Hopkins <a href="http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/14/the-gruesome-math-of-hospital-infections/" target="_blank">told CNN that</a> about 100,000 people die every year from infections they receive at the hospital. “Take the two most deadly types of <a href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/Medical-Malpractice/" target="_blank">infections hospitals</a> give their patients: infections from ventilators and infections from catheters. Together, those kill 65,000 people a year,” he said.</p>
<p>If you or someone you know has been infected while at the hospital in Connecticut—either from faulty or unsterile medications, such as what has been recalled by Abrams, or because of hospital conditions—the most important step is to seek legal counsel. Don’t go through it alone. <a href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/contact" target="_blank">Contact Richard H. Raphael</a>, Attorney at Law, today.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/02/21/unsterile-medications-recalled/">Unsterile Medications Recalled</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog">Westport CT Medical Malpractice Lawyer | Rich Raphael Attorney Blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/02/21/unsterile-medications-recalled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
