<style>
  
#bubble {
top:40px;
right:0;
position:absolute;
display:block;
height:28px;
background:url(images/bubble_right.gif) no-repeat right;
}

#bubble p {
display:block;
font-size:11px;
color:#fff;
height:28px;
padding:4px 12px 0 10px;
background:url(images/bubble_left.gif) no-repeat top left;
}

#content {
margin-top: 20px;
background: #fff!important;
float:left;
/*width:578px;*/
width:71%;
}

#content h2 {
	color: #000;
	font-size: 18px;
	font-weight: 700;
}

#content h2 a {
text-decoration:none;
}

#content h2 a:hover {
text-decoration:underline;
}

#content h2.archive {
font-weight:normal;
font-size:22px;
color:#1c1c1c;
padding:0;
margin:5px 0 20px 0;
border:none;
text-align:left;
}

.comments {
color:#333;
margin:0 0 15px 0;
border-bottom:#bbb 1px solid;
}

.comments a {
background:#fff;
padding:0 7px 5px 0;
color:#333;
text-decoration:none;
}

.comments a:hover {
color:#c00;
}

.navigation {
background:#f9f9f9;
font-size:11px;
padding:5px 10px;
margin:0 0 20px 0;
border-top:#bbb 1px solid;
}

.navigation a {
color:#555;
font-weight:bold;
text-decoration:none;
}

.navigation a:hover {
color:#333;
text-decoration:none;
}

.main h3 {
font-size:16px;
font-weight:normal;
margin:0 0 15px 0;
}

.main img {
padding:2px;
border:#ddd 2px solid;
}

.main a img {
padding:2px;
border:#0085b5 2px solid;
}

.main a:hover img {
padding:2px;
border:#ca0002 2px solid;
}

.main p {
line-height:18px;
margin:0 0 15px 0;
}

.main ol {
line-height:18px;
margin:0 0 15px 30px;
}

.main ul {
line-height:18px;
margin:0 0 15px 30px;
}

.main li {
margin:0 0 5px 0;
}

.meta {
background:#f3f3f3;
font-size:11px;
line-height:15px;
color:#333;
padding:5px 10px;
margin:0 0 30px 0;
border-top:#bbb 1px solid;
}

.signature {
float:left;
padding:0 15px 0 0;
border-right:#bbb 1px solid;
width:200px;
}

.tags {
float:left;
padding:0 0 0 15px;
width:440px;
}

#sidebar {
background: #323232;
border-bottom-right-radius: 30px;
margin-top: 20px;
font-size:12px;
float:right;
width:284px;
padding: 15px;
color: white;
}

#sidebar a {
	color: #DBA922;
}

#sidebar h3 {
display: block;
color: white;
font-size:14px;
margin:20px 0 10px 0;
}

#sidebar ul {
list-style:none;
padding: 0 0 0 20px;
margin: 0;
}

#sidebar ul ul {
margin:5px 0 0 10px;
}

#sidebar ul ul ul {
margin:5px 0 0 10px;
}

#sidebar ul li {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}

#author h3 {
margin:5px 0 5px 0;
}

#searchform {
margin:15px 0 0 0;
}

#searchform input {
background:#222;
font-size:11px;
margin:2px 0;
padding:1px 4px 2px 4px;
border:#888 1px solid;
color:#eee;
}

#searchform input:hover {
background:#333;
border:#999 1px solid;
color:#fff;
cursor:pointer;
}

#searchform #s {
background:#f6f6f6;
font-size:11px;
margin:2px 0;
padding:2px 4px;
border:#aaa 1px solid;
color:#222;
}

#searchform #s:hover {
border:#c00 1px solid;
cursor:text;
}

input.searchfield {
background:#f6f6f6;
font-size:11px;
display:block;
margin:5px 0 8px 0;
padding:2px 4px;
border:#aaa 1px solid;
color:#222;
}

input.searchfield:hover {
background:#eee;
color:#222;
}

input.submit {
background:#222;
font-size:11px;
display:block;
margin:0 0 10px 0;
padding:1px 4px 2px 4px;
border:#888 1px solid;
color:#eee;
}

input.submit:hover {
background:#333;
cursor:pointer;
border:#999 1px solid;
color:#fff;
}

input.subcom {
background:#eee;
font-size:11px;
margin:0 0 10px 0;
padding:1px 4px 2px 4px;
border:#888 1px solid;
color:#222;
}

input.subcom:hover {
background:#222;
cursor:pointer;
border:#888 1px solid;
color:#eee;
}

input.comment {
background:#f6f6f6;
font-size:11px;
padding:2px 4px;
border:#aaa 1px solid;
color:#222;
}

input.comment:hover {
border:#c00 1px solid;
}

textarea {
background:#f6f6f6;
font-size:12px;
width:400px;
padding:2px 4px;
border:#aaa 1px solid;
color:#222;
}

textarea:hover {
border:#c00 1px solid;
}

.postinput small {
font-size:11px;
margin:0 0 0 5px;
}

p.logged {
font-size:12px;
}

h3.reply {
font-size:15px;
margin:0 0 10px 0;
}

.nocomments {
margin:0 0 30px 0;
}

ol.commentlist {
font-size:12px;
list-style:none;
margin:10px 0 30px 0;
border-bottom:#bbb 1px solid;
}

.commentlist li {
border-top:#bbb 1px solid;
padding:0 0 10px 0;
}

.commentlist li.bypostauthor {
border-top:#bbb 5px solid;
background-color:#f3f3f3;
}

.comment_mod {
margin:10px 0 0 10px;
}

.comment_mod em {
background-color:#fff897;
padding:1px 3px;
}

.comment_author {
margin:10px 0;
float:right;
width:190px;
}

.comment_author img {
float:left;
margin:5px 12px 0 0;
}

.comment_author p {
line-height:20px;
}

.comment_author small {
font-size:11px;
}

.comment_text {
float:left;
width:470px;
margin:0 0 0 10px;
}

.comment_text p {
line-height:18px;
margin:7px 0;
}

.comment_meta {
font-size:12px;
}

#commentform p {
line-height:18px;
margin:0 0 15px 0;
}

blockquote {
background:url(images/quote.gif) no-repeat top left;
padding:0 0 0 60px;
min-height:50px;
}

.clear {
clear:both;
}

.warning p {
background:url(images/warning.gif) no-repeat left;
height:160px;
padding:20px 0 0 90px;
font-size:20px;
margin:0 0 0 10px;
}

#wp-calendar {
padding:10px 0 0 0;
font-size:12px;
}

#wp-calendar caption {
text-align:left;
padding:0 0 5px 0;
}

#wp-calendar tr th,
#wp-calendar tr td {
padding:0 6px 0 0 ;
text-align:right;
}

#wp-calendar td a {
font-weight:bold;
}

#wp-calendar td a:hover {
font-weight:bold;
}

img.wp-smiley {
padding:0;
border:none;
}

input:focus, textarea:focus{
background-color:#ffc;
}

abbr {
border:none;
}

.aligncenter {
display: block;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}

.alignleft {
float:left;
}

.alignright {
float:right;
}

.wp-caption {
border:1px solid #ddd;
text-align:center;
background-color:#f3f3f3;
padding-top:4px;
margin:10px;
-moz-border-radius:3px;
-khtml-border-radius:3px;
-webkit-border-radius:3px;
border-radius:3px;
}

.wp-caption img {
margin:0;
padding:0;
border:0 none;
}

.wp-caption-dd {
font-size:11px;
line-height:17px;
padding:0 4px 5px;
margin:0;
}

/* self-clear floats */

.group:after {
content: "."; 
display: block; 
height: 0; 
clear: both; 
visibility: hidden;
}
#content.group .main img{display:none!important;}
#cas_menu{display:none!important;}
#cas_menu ul li a{height:auto!important;}

  </style>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Westport CT Medical Malpractice Lawyer &#124; Rich Raphael Attorney Blog &#187; digital imaging technology</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/tag/digital-imaging-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:46:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>New Medical Technology: Not Always Better at Diagnosis</title>
		<link>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/09/18/new-medical-technology-diagnosis/</link>
		<comments>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/09/18/new-medical-technology-diagnosis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Writer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misdiagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westport Medical Malpractice Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detecting breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital imaging mammograms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital imaging technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expensive technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mammography screenings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new medical technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westport medical malpractice attorney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent study, conducted by researchers at Yale University Medical School of Medicine, concluded that despite the astronomical costs being spent for digital imaging mammograms, this new medical technology may be no more effective in detecting breast cancer than previous methods. The study analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database. The research [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/09/18/new-medical-technology-diagnosis/">New Medical Technology: Not Always Better at Diagnosis</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog">Westport CT Medical Malpractice Lawyer | Rich Raphael Attorney Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright wp-image-278 size-full" style="margin: 5px;" src="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/New-Medical-Technology-Westport-Medical-Malpractice-Attorney.jpg" alt="detecting breast cancer, digital imaging mammograms, expensive technology, new medical technology, Westport medical malpractice attorney, cancer, digital imaging technolog" width="300" height="200" />A <a href="http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/jnci/press_releases/killeleadju159.pdf" target="_blank">recent study</a>, conducted by researchers at Yale University Medical School of Medicine, concluded that despite the astronomical costs being spent for digital imaging mammograms, this new medical technology may be <a href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/medical-malpractice" target="_blank">no more effective in detecting breast cancer</a> than previous methods.</p>
<p>The study analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database. The research team looked at two groups of women, age 66 years of age or older, who had no history of breast cancer over two separate two-year periods. The first group was comprised of 137,150 women who had been tested between 2001 and 2002. The second group was 133,097 women between the years 2008 to 2009.</p>
<p>In the first group, only 2 percent of the women were given mammograms using digital imaging technology and less than 4 percent were tested using computer-aided detection methods. In the second group, those numbers jumped to 30 percent and 33 percent, respectively. The amount billed to Medicare for the two groups increased sharply. The cost of mammography screenings for the first group was $666 million. The cost of the second group was $962 million.</p>
<p>Although digital imaging and computer-aided detection was used more frequently, and at a greater expense, the study found no difference in rates of cancer detection.</p>
<p>The research team urged more research be done to determine what benefit, if any, is had by this new medical technology. In the report, the team wrote, “Our enthusiasm for new technologies should not replace strong, consistent evidence that the benefits of the new technology outweigh the harms in a clinically important way.”</p>
<p>In 2009, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/health/17cancer.html" target="_blank">U.S. Preventive Services Task Force</a> issued a recommendation that it was no longer necessary for women who were in their forties, and who were not at a high risk for breast cancer, to receive routine mammograms. This was a contradiction of what had previously been recommended. However, there continues to be much debate on who should be screened, at what frequency, and what technology should be used.</p>
<p>If you have suffered permanent disabilities or illness because of a doctor’s failure to diagnose, you may be entitled to compensation. Contact an experienced <a href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/contact" target="_blank">Westport medical malpractice attorney</a> to discuss your legal options.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/09/18/new-medical-technology-diagnosis/">New Medical Technology: Not Always Better at Diagnosis</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog">Westport CT Medical Malpractice Lawyer | Rich Raphael Attorney Blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.raphaellaw.com/personal-injury-blog/2014/09/18/new-medical-technology-diagnosis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
